Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
032559 AI generated

Disciplinary liability requires proven facts from the accusation, not criminal conviction with broader facts.

Case Number 032559
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the disciplinary sanction against Mauricio Coelho, ruling that the alleged misconduct lacked sufficient factual basis in the disciplinary proceedings. Although the defendant was later criminally convicted for the same conduct, the court held that the criminal judgment relied on a broader factual scope than what was proven in the disciplinary inquiry. Consequently, the disciplinary authority could not base its penalty on the criminal conviction alone without independent proof of the specific disciplinary facts.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROCESSO DISCIPLINAR INFRACÇÃO DISCIPLINAR INFRACÇÃO PENAL CONDENAÇÃO PENAL

Keywords

AI generated
disciplinary liability proven facts criminal conviction broader factual scope administrative sanction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3 n.º 1 of the EDF
Art. 26 n.º 3 of the EDF
Art. 432 of the CP

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - FUNÇÃO PUBL DISCIPLINAR.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] EDF84 ART3 N1 ART26 N3. CP82 ART432.

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 93

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 09/16/1993

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00039737

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119931209032559

[OBJECTO] SENT TAC PORTO.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] CM DE VILA NOVA DE GAIA

[RECORRIDO 1] COELHO , MAURICIO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/E3CD69552AB689CF802568FC0039002E?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O carácter disciplinarmente ilícito de uma determinada conduta tem de resultar dos factos que, constando da acusação, vieram a ser considerados como provados pelo instrutor, não sendo possível fundá-lo em suposições ou ilações que não ofereçam suporte fáctico bastante.

II - É para o efeito irrelevante que o arguido tenha posteriormente sido condenado em sede criminal pela referida conduta mas com uma base fáctica mais ampla.