Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
089/19.9BCLSB AI generated

Supreme Court allows review of lower court ruling on disciplinary liability of football club under new jurisprudence.

Case Number 089/19.9BCLSB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court admitted the review of a lower court's decision that had revoked a disciplinary pronouncement against Sport Lisboa e Benfica. The lower court had found no grounds for liability, but the Supreme Court noted a shift in its own recent jurisprudence regarding such matters. Consequently, the case was remitted for reconsideration in light of updated legal interpretations.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR TRIBUNAL ARBITRAL FEDERAÇÃO PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL INFRACÇÃO DISCIPLINAR

Keywords

AI generated
administrative procedure review disciplinary liability football jurisprudence evolution remittal for reconsideration administrative court hierarchy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220.º do Código de Processo Administrativo
Art. 221.º do Código de Processo Administrativo

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P27070

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA120210121089/19

[RECORRENTE] FEDERAÇÃO PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL

[RECORRIDO 1] SPORT LISBOA E BENFICA – FUTEBOL, SAD

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/E39B27C9DA3FE88C80258669004CC493?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

É de admitir a revista do acórdão do TCA que revogou a pronúncia do TAD por entender que não havia matéria que permitisse a responsabilização disciplinar da Recorrida, por, aparentemente, não estar de acordo com a mais recente jurisprudência deste Supremo nesta matéria.