Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0176/22.6BCLSB AI generated

Portuguese court allows preliminary objection review regarding procedural impropriety in recognition of rights actions.

Case Number 0176/22.6BCLSB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously admitted a preliminary objection review concerning the procedural impropriety of using a recognition of rights action to challenge acts barred by statute of limitations. The applicant argued that the lower court erred in dismissing the objection under Article 38(2) of the Code of Administrative Procedure. The court decided to review the matter because the issue involves complex legal expansion affecting numerous individuals and raises legitimate doubts about the lower court's position.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR MEIO PROCESSUAL

Keywords

AI generated
procedural impropriety recognition of rights statute of limitations preliminary objection administrative procedure legal complexity expansive potential

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 38(2) of the Code of Administrative Procedure
Art. 10(1) of the Administrative Procedure Code

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P33924

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1202606260176/22

[RECORRENTE] AA E OUTROS

[RECORRIDO 1] INSTITUTO DOS REGISTOS E DO NOTARIADO (IRN), I.P.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/DCEDBDC50AA583D480258CDF002EF12D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Justifica-se admitir a revista que incide sobre matéria de alguma complexidade, com elevada potencialidade expansiva e que interessa a um número alargado de pessoas, suscitando-se legitimas dúvidas sobre o acerto da posição adoptada pelo acórdão recorrido quando julgou procedente a excepção prevista no nº. 2 do artº. 38º. do CPTA, que designou por impropriedade do meio processual, com o fundamento que se utilizou a acção de reconhecimento de direitos para obter efeitos que resultariam da anulação de actos que eram inimpugnáveis por efeito do decurso do respectivo prazo de impugnação.