Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0677/12 AI generated

Portuguese Supreme Administrative Court dismisses review appeal lacking social relevance and requiring no special interpretative effort.

Case Number 0677/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supremo Tribunal Administrativo unanimously dismissed the review appeal filed by A...... against the Portuguese Army. The court held that admitting the appeal was inappropriate because the legal questions lacked particular social relevance and did not demonstrate a community interest strong enough to justify the extraordinary remedy. Furthermore, the resolution did not require a special interpretative effort, as the difficulty was within the normal range of judicial controversies. Consequently, the appeal was rejected for failing to meet the strict admissibility criteria for review proceedings.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISTA PRESSUPOSTOS

Keywords

AI generated
review appeal admissibility social relevance requirement community interest standard interpretative effort threshold Supreme Administrative Court extraordinary remedy criteria Portuguese administrative law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 52.º da Lei n.º 83/2012

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P14382

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1201206280677

[RECORRENTE] A......

[RECORRIDO 1] EXÉRCITO PORTUGUÊS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/DC58DFDFF62753F080257A33005394DB?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não é de admitir a revista se, por um lado, as questões que nela se pretendem ver resolvidas não têm particular relevância social, não evidenciando um interesse comunitário que, pela sua especial importância pudesse levar, por si só, à admissão do recurso e, por outro lado, a sua resolução não requer um esforço interpretativo particularmente acentuado, antes apresentando um grau de dificuldade que não ultrapassa o que é normal nas controvérsias judiciárias.