Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0957/11.6BELSB AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against final judgment denying supplementary remuneration for function accumulation by a magistrate.

Case Number 0957/11.6BELSB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the appeal against a final judgment that rejected a magistrate's claim for supplementary remuneration due to function accumulation. The lower courts had already ruled that the claim was unfounded, and the magistrate argued for the payment based on statutory entitlements. The court held that since the final decision aligns with established Supreme Court jurisprudence, no further review of the judgment is permitted.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR MAGISTRADO DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO ACUMULAÇÃO DE FUNÇÕES COMPLEMENTO DE REMUNERAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
function accumulation supplementary remuneration magistrate status final judgment jurisprudence firmness administrative appeal dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 220.º, n.º 1, do Código de Processo Administrativo
Art. 221.º, n.º 1, do Código de Processo Administrativo

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P27034

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1202101140957/11

[RECORRENTE] A............

[RECORRIDO 1] MINISTÉRIO DA JUSTIÇA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/DBB128902B97DF1C802586620046EEBE?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não é de admitir a revista do acórdão confirmativo da sentença que julgou improcedente a acção proposta por uma Magistrada do MºPº contra o Ministério da Justiça para obter a remuneração suplementar devida por uma acumulação de funções, já que a pronúncia unânime das instâncias se filiou numa jurisprudência firme do Supremo, que não reclama reapreciação.