Legislator Case Law & Legislation
026032 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal against asylum refusal when applicant fails to challenge the refusal act itself.

Case Number 026032
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appellant's contentious appeal regarding the refusal of asylum. The applicant challenged the refusal act but instead alleged a non-existent subsequent act of denial, failing to identify any procedural vices in the original decision. The court ruled that without a valid challenge to the actual refusal act, the appeal lacks merit and must be rejected.

Legislator headnote

Official

ASILO POLITICO RECUSA LIMINAR RECURSO CONTENCIOSO ERRO SOBRE O OBJECTO

Keywords

AI generated
asylum refusal appeal procedural vices requirement non-existent act challenge administrative asylum law contentious appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 15-A of Law 38/80 of August 1, 1980
Art. 2 of Decree-Law 415/83 of November 24, 1983

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - ASILO. DIR ADM CONT - ACTO. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] L 38/80 DE 1980/08/01 ART10 ART15. DL 415/83 DE 1983/11/24 ART2. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 6538 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 89 [APENDICE] DR [DATA DE ENTRADA] 05/17/1988 [DATA DO APENDICE] 12/30/1994 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00024666 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119891116026032 [OBJECTO] DESP MINAI E MINJ DE 1988/01/27. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] BEHZADIAN , SHAHROOZ [RECORRIDO 1] MINAI - MINJ [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/D518DB8EC7CD6E47802568FC00378BBC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Tendo sido liminarmente recusado o pedido de asilo, nos termos do artigo 15-A da Lei n. 38/80. de 1 de Agosto (aditado pelo artigo 2 do Decreto-Lei n. 415/83, de 24 de Novembro), não procede o recurso interposto contra o respectivo acto, se o recorrente não arguiu quaisquer vicios desse acto de recusa, mas antes de um outro pretenso acto, que não chegou na realidade a ser emitido, ou seja, negação do pedido de asilo.