Administrative court dismisses appeal due to procedural defects and failure to identify the act's author.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court unanimously rejected the appeal filed by Edgardo Costa against a decision from CEMFA. The court ruled that the petition contained significant formal deficiencies, specifically the failure to properly identify the author of the contested administrative act within the statutory timeframe. Consequently, the court applied the principle that unresolved procedural flaws result in the immediate denial of the appeal's preliminary request.
Legislator headnote
OfficialPETIÇÃO DEFICIENTE NOTIFICAÇÃO IDENTIFICAÇÃO DO AUTOR DO ACTO RECORRIDO INDEFERIMENTO PRELIMINAR
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 256-A/77 DE 1977/06/17 ART1 N4. RSTA57 ART103. CADM40 ART838 PAR1. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 4103 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0 [APENDICE] DR [DATA DE ENTRADA] 10/07/1982 [DATA DO APENDICE] 02/06/1987 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00003275 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119841018017943 [OBJECTO] DESP CEMFA DE 1982/04/08. [PAGINA] 0 [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] COSTA , EDGARDO [RECORRIDO 1] CEMFA [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/D4035582A4BB1908802568FC003829CE?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
As deficiencias de forma que não forem supridas pelo recorrente no prazo fixado na notificação determinam o indeferimento liminar do recurso.