Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0364/16.4BELSB AI generated

Review appeal dismissed because applicant failed to challenge the TCA's specific ruling on action caducity.

Case Number 0364/16.4BELSB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the review appeal lodged by the applicant against the Institute of Social Security. The applicant argued the unemployment benefit denial was null, yet the Tribunal de Contas de Albufeira had previously ruled that the right of action had lapsed. The court held that a review appeal must specifically address the concrete issue decided by the lower tribunal, which was the caducity of the action, rather than merely repeating the nullity claim of the original act.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR CPTA

Keywords

AI generated
review appeal admissibility caducity of action specific issue challenge unemployment benefit denial Tribunal de Contas ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 104.º da Lei de Acesso aos Tribunais
Art. 105.º da Lei de Acesso aos Tribunais

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P24133

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1201901250364/16

[RECORRENTE] A.......

[RECORRIDO 1] INSTITUTO DA SEGURANÇA SOCIAL,IP

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/CCB245F7CA1A01CC80258393003C288D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não se justifica admitir recurso de revista se o recorrente não impugna a questão concretamente decidida, isto é, tendo o acórdão do TCA decidido que tinha caducado o direito de acção, quer o acto de indeferimento do subsídio de desemprego fosse nulo, ou anulável, o recorrente limita-se a defender, na revista, que o acto impugnado é nulo.