Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0281/03 AI generated

Portuguese court holds that a judge's failure to invite supplementation of an initial pleading does not constitute nullity by omission.

Case Number 0281/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal regarding the nullity of a judicial objection procedure. The appellant argued that the judge's failure to formally invite the submission of missing documents or corrections violated procedural rules. The court ruled that such an omission does not render the act null because the law imposes only a prudential duty to invite, not a strict requirement for formal supplementation.

Legislator headnote

Official

PETIÇÃO INICIAL. NULIDADE. DESPACHO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial objection procedure nullity by omission prudential duty initial pleading defects procedural supplementation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 110, n.º 2, CPPT
Art. 193, n.º 1, CPC96
Art. 193, n.º 2, CPC96
Art. 288, n.º 1, CPC96
Art. 494, B, CPC96
Art. 203, n.º 2, CPC96

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR PROC TRIBUT CONT - IMPUGN JUDICIAL.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPPTRIB99 ART104 ART110 N1. CPC96 ART193 N1 ART193 N2 C ART288 N1 E ART494 B ART476 ART203 N2.

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 01/28/2003

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00060100

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA2200310010281

[OBJECTO] DESP TT1INST DE LISBOA.

[RECORRENTE] A...

[RECORRIDO 1] FAZENDA PUBLICA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/CCAF0B75833F2CCA80256DBB003B7DC8?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Como o artº 110º, nº 2, CPPT, impõe ao juiz um dever prudencial de convidar a suprir qualquer deficiência ou irregularidade da petição inicial de impugnação judicial, a omissão desse dever prudencial não acarreta nulidade por omissão de acto legalmente devido.