Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0905/08 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court admits review appeal due to divergent administrative interpretations on substitute teacher work conditions.

Case Number 0905/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously admitted the review appeal regarding the conditions for substitute teacher work. The lower administrative courts had issued divergent decisions on the interpretation of norms defining substitute work as extraordinary labor and its corresponding qualification and remuneration. The court ruled that such divergence justified admitting the appeal to ensure the uniform application of law and address significant legal and social relevance.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISTA PRESSUPOSTOS SERVIÇO DOCENTE

Keywords

AI generated
substitute teacher work extraordinary labor qualification remuneration standards divergent administrative decisions review appeal admission uniform application of law educational staff norms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 104.º-A, n.º 1, alínea a), da Lei n.º 83/2017
Art. 104.º-B, n.º 1, alínea a), da Lei n.º 83/2017

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA0009706

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1200811120905

[RECORRENTE] ME

[RECORRIDO 1] A...

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/C5F29F8FF365C22380257501004AA021?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Havendo duas orientações divergentes nas decisões dos tribunais administrativos sobre a interpretação das normas que definem as condições de prestação do trabalho docente de substituição de professores em falta e a respectiva qualificação e remuneração como trabalho extraordinário, justifica-se a admissão do recurso de revista com fundamento na sua relevância jurídica e social e também para melhor aplicação do direito.