Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
022554 AI generated

Failure to address an official question of admissibility is a judgment error, not a nullity due to omission of pronouncement.

Case Number 022554
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the claimant's request for nullity based on the alleged omission of a pronouncement regarding an official question of admissibility. The court held that the lower tribunal's failure to explicitly rule on this procedural issue did not constitute a nullity but rather a mere error in judgment. Consequently, the remedy of nullity was rejected because the omission did not affect the validity of the decision itself.

Legislator headnote

Official

NULIDADE DE ACÓRDÃO CONHECIMENTO OFICIOSO OMISSÃO DE PRONÚNCIA

Keywords

AI generated
official question of admissibility nullity due to omission error in judgment pronouncement requirement procedural nullity administrative court CPC 1996 provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC 1996 Art. 668 n. 1
CPC 1996 Art. 716
CPC 1996 Art. 722
CPC 1996 Art. 732

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STA PROC 23281 of 1999/07/08
AC STJ of 1997/10/15 in BMJ N470 p.377
AC STAPLENO PROC 32755 of 1997/03/05

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR PROC TRIBUT CONT.

[AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR PROC CIV.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPC96 ART668 N1 D ART716 ART722 ART732.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC23281 DE 1999/07/08. AC STJ DE 1997/10/15 IN BMJ N470 PAG377. AC STAPLENO PROC32755 DE 1997/03/05.

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 99

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 03/04/1998

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00052466

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA219991027022554

[OBJECTO] AC STA PROC22554.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] RITA E AMARAL LDA

[RECORRIDO 1] FAZENDA PUBLICA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/C4F34D8A2C5ED41A802568FC003A1237?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A falta de apreciação de eventual questão de conhecimento oficioso não integra nulidade por omissão de pronúncia mas erro de julgamento.