Administrative court dismisses appeal allowing discretionary power holders to set case-specific limits but forbids permanent self-binding rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal filed by Martins against the General Chief of the EME regarding the exercise of discretionary power. The court held that while a discretionary official may create specific norms to limit their actions in a concrete case, they cannot bind themselves permanently through rules of execution. This distinction ensures that administrative discretion remains flexible for future situations while preventing arbitrary self-imposed constraints on future decision-making.
Legislator headnote
OfficialOFICIAL DO EXERCITO CURSO COMPLEMENTAR DE ESPECIALIZAÇÃO PODER DISCRICIONARIO AUTOVINCULAÇÃO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER.
[AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR MIL - EST MIL.
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA DE 1970/01/23 IN AD N100 PAG520. AC STA PROC10152 DE 1977/04/21. AC STA DE 1978/12/07 IN AD N206 PAG204. AC STAPLENO PROC11865 DE 1986/02/25.
[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 4292
[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 86
[APENDICE] DR
[DATA DE ENTRADA] 10/17/1984
[DATA DO APENDICE] 10/15/1992
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00023762
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119861111021495
[OBJECTO] DESP CEME DE 1984/04/17.
[PRIVACIDADE] 01
[RECORRENTE] MARTINS , HERCULANO
[RECORRIDO 1] GENERAL CHEFE DO EME
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/A2F1B7ACE0BAFFEB802568FC0037BD7F?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
O titular do poder discricionario tem a faculdade de elaborar normas limitativas para o seu exercicio num caso concreto, - so lhe não sendo permitido auto-vincular-se por regras de execução permanente.