Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
024045 AI generated

Nulity of agreement denied when dissenting vote exists and irrelevant concept was clarified by adjoint.

Case Number 024045
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the claim challenging the nullity of the agreement. The court found no defect in the decision's reasoning because a dissenting vote was present and the adjoint clarified an irrelevant concept regarding irreparable harm. Consequently, the requirement for a unanimous, fully founded decision was not met, and the nullity claim failed.

Legislator headnote

Official

SUSPENSÃO DE EFICACIA NULIDADE DE ACORDÃO PREJUIZO IRREPARAVEL

Keywords

AI generated
nullity of agreement lack of reasoning dissenting vote irreparable harm administrative procedure unanimity requirement procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC 67 Art. 668 n. 1
CPC 67 Art. 716 n. 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - MEIO PROC ACESSORIO SUSPEFIC. [AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR PROC CIV. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPC67 ART668 N1 B ART716 N1. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 3611 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 86 [APENDICE] DR [DATA DE ENTRADA] 06/24/1986 [DATA DO APENDICE] 07/22/1992 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00024275 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119860916024045 [OBJECTO] AC STA. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] UCP VINTE E UM DE MAIO [RECORRIDO 1] MINAP E OUTRO [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/96CF5DA4D600AF16802568FC0037BF3C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não se verifica a nulidade de acordão por falta de fundamentação quando ha um voto de vencido e o 1 adjunto declara não aceitar a concepção contida no acordão relativamente ao que devia entender-se por prejuizos irreparaveis se este conceito foi irrelevante para a decisão que veio a ser tomada.*