Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
029980 AI generated

Opposition of judgments rejected when fundamental legal issues were not previously decided.

Case Number 029980
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the opposition of judgments filed by the applicants against the lower court's ruling. The court found that the fundamental legal issue in question had not been previously adjudicated, thereby failing to meet the requirements for such an opposition under the relevant administrative procedure law. Consequently, the opposition was deemed inadmissible because it did not address a new or unresolved legal matter.

Legislator headnote

Official

OPOSIÇÃO DE JULGADOS MATÉRIA DE DIREITO

Keywords

AI generated
opposition of judgments fundamental legal issue administrative procedure law inadmissible opposition previously adjudicated matter

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24, letter b) of the Administrative Procedure Law
Art. 763 of the Civil Procedure Code
Art. 487, No. 2 of the Civil Code
Art. 498, No. 1, No. 3 of the Civil Code
DL 48051 of 1967/11/21, Art. 5

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STA PROC 17474 of 1985/07/04

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT. [AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR PROC CIV. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] ETAF84 ART24 B. CPC67 ART763. CCIV66 ART487 N2 ART498 N1 N3. DL 48051 DE 1967/11/21 ART5. [JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC17474 DE 1985/07/04. [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 93 [DATA DE ENTRADA] 12/17/1992 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00038021 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAP19930930029980 [OBJECTO] AC 1 SECÇÃO DE 1992/03/24 - AC 1 SECÇÃO DE 1985/07/04. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] CABRITA , MANUEL E OUTROS [RECORRIDO 1] JF DE S BARTOLOMEU DE MESSINES [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/956DF5FAFD980F23802568FC0038F3D3?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não se verifica oposição de acórdãos, para efeitos do disposto no artigo 24 alínea b) do ETAF, quando não foi apreciada a mesma questão fundamental de direito.