Administrative court dismisses appeal on prescription of non-contractual liability, citing established precedent on limitation periods.

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appellant's request for a review of the administrative act regarding non-contractual liability. The appellant argued for indemnification, but the court noted that the prescription issue had already been definitively resolved in prior decisions by this tribunal. Consequently, the court refused to admit the preliminary review, adhering to the principle that such matters are governed by settled jurisprudence.