Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
008484 AI generated

Opposition of judgments rejected because the cited decisions involved different planning situations and legal issues.

Case Number 008484
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the opposition of judgments filed by the applicant against the municipality of Évora. The applicant argued for a legal conflict between the cited decisions, but the court found the decisions addressed entirely different planning situations regarding land lots. Consequently, the court ruled that no opposition of judgments exists because the legal issues do not share a common foundation.

Legislator headnote

Official

OPOSIÇÃO DE JULGADOS MESMO FUNDAMENTO DE DIREITO LOTEAMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
opposition of judgments identical legal issues planning situation land lots jurisdictional conflict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC Art. 763
LOSTA Art. 25, N.º 4, Par. 1
RSTA Art. 103
DL 46673/1965
CPC Art. 767, N.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - REC JURISDICIONAL. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPC39 ART763. LOSTA56 ART25 N4 PAR1. RSTA57 ART103. DL 46673 DE 1965/11/29. CPC67 ART767 N1. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 812 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 72 [APENDICE] DG [DATA DE ENTRADA] 07/15/1971 [DATA DO APENDICE] 09/24/1973 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00016239 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119720629008484 [OBJECTO] AC 1 SECÇÃO - AC 1 SECÇÃO DE 1971/07/01. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] ALFAIATE , LUIS [RECORRIDO 1] CM DE EVORA [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/8FFF183E67738290802568FC00372BC9?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Para que exista oposição de julgados e necessario que as soluções opostas assentem sobre a mesma questão de direito, o que não se verifica nos acordãos invocados cujas decisões incidiram sobre planos de loteamento em situação totalmente diversa.*