Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
01602/13 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses pilot's claim for return of indemnity via common action due to procedural impropriety.

Case Number 01602/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the pilot's administrative action seeking the return of a liquidated indemnity. The pilot argued the payment lacked legal basis under Article 37 of the Civil Service Statute, while the opposing party contended the payment was valid and unchallenged. The court ruled that since the original payment order was not contested, the claim had no legal foundation and the chosen procedural route was inappropriate.

Legislator headnote

Official

PILOTO AVIADOR FORÇA AÉREA INDEMNIZAÇÃO REGULAMENTO LEI DO SERVIÇO MILITAR

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Service Statute Liquidated Indemnity Administrative Action Procedural Impropriety Unchallenged Order Supreme Administrative Court Return of Payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 37, n.º 2, alínea d) do CPTA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P16877

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12014011601602

[RECORRENTE] A...

[RECORRIDO 1] MDN E OUTRO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/8DF6F0ADE849333680257C6800389D29?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não é de admitir revista de acórdão que julgou que a pretensão formulada pelo Autor, de devolução da indemnização liquidada em cumprimento do Despacho do Director de Pessoal da FAP., sem impugnação deste mesmo Despacho, não encontra qualquer fundamento no artigo 37°, nº 2, alínea d) do CPTA, pelo que é manifesta a inidoneidade do meio processual utilizado (acção administrativa comum).