Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
023381 AI generated

Administrative court annuls agricultural reserve grant due to factual errors and contradictory evidence regarding permanent residence.

Case Number 023381
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court annulled the Minister's decision granting a joint agricultural reserve to the applicant. The court found the administrative evidence weak, contradictory, and insufficient to prove the applicant met the permanent residence requirement under the relevant law. Consequently, the grant was declared void for violating the law due to errors in the factual premises.

Legislator headnote

Official

REFORMA AGRARIA RESERVA CONJUNTA TRATAMENTO UNITARIO EXPLORAÇÃO DIRECTA ACTIVIDADE PRINCIPAL RESIDENCIA PERMANENTE PROVA ERRO NOS PRESSUPOSTOS DE FACTO

Keywords

AI generated
agricultural reserve grant permanent residence requirement factual error annulment contradictory administrative evidence joint reserve exploitation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 663 of the CPC 1967
Art. 57 n.1 and n.2, letter B of the LPTA 1985
Art. 26 n.1 and Art. 32 n.3 of Law 77/77 of September 29, 1977

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM ECON - REFORMA AGRARIA. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPC67 ART663. LPTA85 ART57 N1 N2 B. L 77/77 DE 1977/09/29 ART26 N1 ART32 N3. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 3081 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0 [APENDICE] DR [DATA DE ENTRADA] 12/05/1985 [DATA DO APENDICE] 11/15/1994 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00019265 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119890504023381 [OBJECTO] DESP MINAP DE 1985/06/05. [PAGINA] 0 [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] UCP A LUTA E DE TODOS CRL [RECORRIDO 1] MINAPA E OUTRO [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/89C0AF5CD530CCBF802568FC00374B41?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não resultando da prova produzida no processo administrativo gracioso, alias debil e contraditoria, que no reservatario concorrem os requisitos do n.3 do art. 32 da Lei 77/77 de 29 de Setembro, então em vigor, esta o despacho que concedeu reserva unitaria com aquele fundamento, ferido de violação de lei, por erro nos pressupostos, o que determina sua anulação.