Legislator Case Law & Legislation
01/23.0BEBRG.SA1 AI generated

Portuguese court dismisses lawyer's claim for nullity of a judgment due to lack of pronouncement or reasoning.

Case Number 01/23.0BEBRG.SA1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the lawyer's claim challenging the nullity of a prior judgment. The Recurrent argued that the lower court failed to issue a pronouncement or provide sufficient reasoning for its decision. The court held that since the contested judgment contained neither omission of pronouncement nor lack of fundamentation, the grounds for the claim were invalid.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR PEDIDO REFORMA RECLAMAÇÃO NULIDADE DE ACÓRDÃO

Keywords

AI generated
administrative procedure nullity of judgment omission of pronouncement lack of reasoning lawyer's claim supreme administrative court procedural admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 104.º do Código de Processo Administrativo
Art. 105.º do Código de Processo Administrativo

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P35340

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12026032501/23

[RECORRENTE] AA

[RECORRIDO 1] CONSELHO SUPERIOR DA ORDEM DOS ADVOGADOS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/65F2CD129C61548680258DC700440789?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não incorrendo o acórdão reclamado nas nulidades de omissão de pronúncia ou de falta de fundamentação, não pode proceder a reclamação apresentada.