Legislator Case Law & Legislation
028038 AI generated

Administrative appeal dismissed for merely repeating lower court conclusions without attacking specific judgment grounds.

Case Number 028038
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the administrative appeal filed by Ruy Sousa against a decision by MINAI. The appellant failed to challenge the specific legal and factual foundations of the lower court's ruling, instead only restating the conclusions from the contested proceedings. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal lacked merit because it did not provide a substantive attack on the original judgment's reasoning.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO PARA O PLENO DA SECÇÃO OBJECTO DO RECURSO JURISDICIONAL OBJECTO DO RECURSO CONTENCIOSO ALEGAÇÕES CONCLUSÕES

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal lack of merit repetition of conclusions substantive attack lower court grounds inadmissible appeal procedural requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ETAF84 Art. 24-A
LPTA85 Art. 102
CPC67 Art. 676, n.º 1

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STAPLENO PROC26557 DE 1992/07/09
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STAPLENO PROC26557 DE 1992/07/09.
AC STAPLENO PROC17764 DE 1992/12/17
AC STAPLENO PROC17764 DE 1992/12/17.
AC STAPLENO PROC27694 DE 1994/01/20
AC STAPLENO PROC27694 DE 1994/01/20.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - REC JURISDICIONAL.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] ETAF84 ART24 A. LPTA85 ART102. CPC67 ART676 N1.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STAPLENO PROC26557 DE 1992/07/09. AC STAPLENO PROC17764 DE 1992/12/17. AC STAPLENO PROC27694 DE 1994/01/20.

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 94

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 02/25/1993

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00038966

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAP19940222028038

[OBJECTO] AC 1 SECÇÃO.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] SOUSA , RUY

[RECORRIDO 1] MINAI

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/64B0715A700D4AF0802568FC0038EE7C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não procede o recurso interposto para o Pleno da Secção de acórdão proferido pela Subsecção, se na respectiva alegação, o recorrente se limita a reproduzir as conclusões da alegação do recurso contencioso, não atacando o acórdão recorrido nos seus específicos fundamentos.