Supreme Administrative Court dismisses lawyer's appeal regarding the inadmissibility of a disciplinary complaint against a judge.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the appeal filed by a lawyer against the inadmissibility of a disciplinary complaint lodged against a judge. The lawyer argued that the complaint violated procedural rights and lacked sufficient factual basis, while the opposing party maintained the complaint met all statutory requirements for filing. The court ruled that the initial decision correctly applied the law, finding no merit in the procedural objections raised by the appellant.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 100.º n.º 1, alínea b), do Código de Processo Administrativo; Art. 101.º do Código de Processo Administrativo: The disciplinary complaint against a judge is admissible if it strictly adheres to statutory formalities and substantive requirements, and procedural defects do not justify automatic inadmissibility absent fundamental violations.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P26555
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12020101502844/17
[RECORRENTE] A............
[RECORRIDO 1] ORDEM DOS ADVOGADOS
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/6120DB9AEAB00BC08025860A005123CB?OpenDocument