Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
009222 AI generated

Portuguese court holds jury deliberations on public appointments need no legal reasoning and are immune from challenge.

Case Number 009222
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal challenging the lack of reasoning in a jury's appointment decision. The appellant argued that legal deliberations must be justified, while the court found no statutory requirement for such fundamentation. Consequently, the court ruled that the technical evaluation of candidates is a free and discretionary act, rendering it unchallengeable in court.

Legislator headnote

Official

CONCURSO DE PROVIMENTO JURI DELIBERAÇÃO FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DISCRICIONARIEDADE TECNICA

Keywords

AI generated
jury deliberations public appointments legal fundamentation technical discretion administrative challenge unappealable act statutory requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
DL 41668 de 1958, Art. 20
D 46653 de 1965, Art. 28
LOSTA56, Art. 28
CADM40, Art. 831

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STA PROC7959 PROC8021 de 1971/07/15
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC7959 PROC8021 DE 1971/07/15.
AC STA de 1967/02/17 in AD N65 pag809
AC STA DE 1967/02/17 IN AD N65 PAG809.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - FUNÇÃO PUBL ESTATUTARIO. DIR ADM CONT - ACTO. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 41668 DE 1958/06/07 ART20 PARUNICO. D 46653 DE 1965/11/19. LOSTA56 ART28. CADM40 ART831. [JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC7959 PROC8021 DE 1971/07/15. AC STA DE 1967/02/17 IN AD N65 PAG809. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 872 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 75 [APENDICE] DG [DATA DE ENTRADA] 05/06/1974 [DATA DO APENDICE] 03/28/1977 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00013558 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119751023009222 [OBJECTO] DESP MINMARI DE 1974/03/28. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] SANTOS , FRANCISCO [RECORRIDO 1] MINMARI - GOMES , ANTONIO [REFERENCIA PUBLICACAO 1] AD N171 ANOXV PAG342 [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/552F442F6CFBC960802568FC003708A3?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO I - A lei não impõe que as deliberações do juri sejam fundamentadas.

II - A apreciação feita quanto ao merito ou demerito dos concorrentes e livre e tecnicamente discricionaria, sendo por isso contenciosamente inatacavel.