Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
002475 AI generated

Portuguese court dismisses appeal against judge's discretionary order for final costs during fiscal execution suspension.

Case Number 002475
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal filed by Antonio Mota against a judicial order requiring him to pay final court costs while the fiscal execution was suspended. The Fazenda Nacional argued that the judge's decision to suspend the process and order payment was a valid exercise of discretionary power, distinct from the specific suspension grounds in Article 825 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court held that such a discretionary act is not subject to appeal under Article 679 of the Civil Procedure Code, thereby upholding the lower court's procedural ruling.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXECUÇÃO FISCAL SUSPENSÃO DA INSTANCIA LIQUIDAÇÃO DE CUSTAS A FINAL DESPACHO NO USO DE PODER DISCRICIONARIO

Keywords

AI generated
fiscal execution suspension discretionary judicial power final court costs payment inadmissible appeal civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 122, 1st paragraph of the Civil Code
Art. 264 of the Civil Procedure Code
Art. 269 of the Civil Procedure Code
Art. 679 of the Civil Procedure Code
II - Semelhante despacho e, por isso, insusceptivel de recurso, nos termos do art. 679 do Codigo de Processo Civil.
Art. 825 of the Civil Procedure Code
I - E de ter-se como proferido no uso legal de um poder discricionario do juiz o despacho que, suspendendo o andamento do processo por causa diferente da expressa no art. 825 do Codigo de Processo Civil, ordena o pagamento das custas a final do processo, e não ja.
DL 25/77 of 1977/01/19
DL 146/79 of 1979/05/23

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR PROC TRIBUT CONT - EXEC FISCAL.

[AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR PROC CIV.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CCJ62 ART122 N1. CPCI63 ART264 ART269. CPC67 ART679 N1 ART825. DL 25/77 DE 1977/01/19. DL 146/79 DE 1979/05/23.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 460

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0

[APENDICE] DR

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 02/04/1983

[DATA DO APENDICE] 05/20/1986

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00005408

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA219830629002475

[OBJECTO] AC T2INSTCI.

[PAGINA] 0

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] FAZENDA NACIONAL

[RECORRIDO 1] MOTA , ANTONIO

[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] RODRIGUES BASTOS NOTAS AO CODIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL VIII PAG273.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/54B815B2F23FD2D2802568FC0038480B?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - E de ter-se como proferido no uso legal de um poder discricionario do juiz o despacho que, suspendendo o andamento do processo por causa diferente da expressa no art. 825 do Codigo de Processo Civil, ordena o pagamento das custas a final do processo, e não ja.

II - Semelhante despacho e, por isso, insusceptivel de recurso, nos termos do art. 679 do Codigo de Processo Civil.