Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
000203 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses jurisdictional conflict appeal due to lack of opposing final judgments and procedural timeliness issues.

Case Number 000203
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court refused to examine the jurisdictional conflict filed by Jose Carmo against RL, citing the absence of two opposing final judgments as required by the 1931 Decree. The court held that the one-year deadline for filing such appeals only applies to cases where the Tribunal de Conflitos is competent, which was not established here. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the statutory conditions for triggering the conflict mechanism were not met.

Legislator headnote

Official

CONFLITO DE COMPETENCIA DECISÃO FINAL TRANSITO EM JULGADO COMPETENCIA DO TRIBUNAL DE CONFLITOS TEMPESTIVIDADE DO RECURSO

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional conflict final judgments requirement procedural timeliness Tribunal de Conflitos competence determination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 103, para. 2 of Decree n. 19243/1931
I - Não havendo dois julgados opostos, não existe, como se preve no paragrafo 2 do art. 103 do Decreto n.
Art. 107, II of the CPC/67
Art. 493, I and II of the CPC/67
Art. 494, I of the CPC/67
Art. 676, I of the CPC/67
Art. 685 of the CPC/67
Art. 687 of the CPC/67
Art. 721, I of the CPC/67
Art. 754, B of the CPC/67
Art. 760 of the CPC/67

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPC67 ART107 N2 ART115 ART493 N1 N2 ART494 N1 F ART676 N1 ART685 ART687 ART721 N1 ART754 B ART760. D 19243 DE 1931/01/16 ART103 PAR2.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 7

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 89

[APENDICE] DR

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 01/13/1988

[DATA DO APENDICE] 10/31/1990

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00029814

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAC19890119000203

[OBJECTO] NEGATIVO JURISDIÇÃO.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] CARMO , JOSE

[RECORRIDO 1] RL

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/548D6CB8E8DA3AD0802568FC0037DEAC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Não havendo dois julgados opostos, não existe, como se preve no paragrafo 2 do art. 103 do Decreto n. 19243, uma "ultima decisão" sobre a incompetencia.

II - O prazo de um ano estabelecido naquele preceito apenas se adequa as hipoteses de desacordos firmados na ordem juridica para cujo conhecimento seja competente o Tribunal de Conflitos.*