Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
046440A AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court holds that limiting the Pleno's cognition to legal questions via CPTA Art. 12(3) is constitutional.

Case Number 046440A
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously rejected the Recurso para o Pleno, ruling that the limitation of the Pleno's cognition to legal issues under Article 12(3) of the CPTA is constitutional. The Recorrente challenged this restriction, arguing it violated constitutional principles regarding the Pleno's powers, while the Recorrido maintained the statutory framework ensures proper judicial organization. The court affirmed that the legislative restriction does not infringe upon constitutional guarantees, thereby upholding the validity of the procedural limitation.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO PARA O PLENO DA SECÇÃO PODERES DE COGNIÇÃO INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE MATERIAL MATÉRIA DE DIREITO

Keywords

AI generated
Pleno cognition limitation CPTA Article 12 constitutional validity judicial organization administrative procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 12(3) CPTA
O art. 12º, 3 do CPTA limitar o âmbito de cognição do Pleno da 1ª Secção do STA a questões de direito não é inconstitucional.
Art. 103(2) Constitution

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC TC 38/87
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC TC 38/87 DE 1987/02/03.; AC TC 65/88 DE 1988/03/23.; AC TC 219/89 DE 1989/02/15.; AC TC 124/90 DE 1990/04/19.
AC TC 65/88
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC TC 38/87 DE 1987/02/03.; AC TC 65/88 DE 1988/03/23.; AC TC 219/89 DE 1989/02/15.; AC TC 124/90 DE 1990/04/19.
AC TC 219/89
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC TC 38/87 DE 1987/02/03.; AC TC 65/88 DE 1988/03/23.; AC TC 219/89 DE 1989/02/15.; AC TC 124/90 DE 1990/04/19.
AC TC 124/90
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC TC 38/87 DE 1987/02/03.; AC TC 65/88 DE 1988/03/23.; AC TC 219/89 DE 1989/02/15.; AC TC 124/90 DE 1990/04/19.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - REC JURISDICIONAL.

[AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR CONST.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] ETAF02 ART12 N3 ART24 N1 D ART25 N1 A. LPTA85 ART103 N2. CPTA02 ART140 ART148 ART149 N3 ART150.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC TC 38/87 DE 1987/02/03.; AC TC 65/88 DE 1988/03/23.; AC TC 219/89 DE 1989/02/15.; AC TC 124/90 DE 1990/04/19.

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 09/15/2005

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00066270

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA120100210046440A

[OBJECTO] DESP RELATOR.

[RECORRENTE] A...

[RECORRIDO 1] MINAMB DO ORDENAMENTO DO TERRITÓRIO E DESENVOLVIMENTO REGIONAL E MINTRAB E DA SOLIDARIEDADE SOCIAL

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/52E7CC111CDBB88C802576CF005B4FE1?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O art. 12º, 3 do CPTA limitar o âmbito de cognição do Pleno da 1ª Secção do STA a questões de direito não é inconstitucional.