Legislator Case Law & Legislation
013802 AI generated

Administrative court annuls unreasoned judicial order for lack of fact and law reasoning.

Case Number 013802
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court annulled a judicial order that had extinguished the proceedings without providing specific factual or legal grounds. The respondent argued that the lack of reasoning violated procedural rights, while the public authority contended the order was valid. The court ruled that an order extinguishing a case must explicitly state the reasons for both facts and law to be legally sound.

Legislator headnote

Official

CONTRA-ORDENAÇÃO DESPACHO JUDICIAL EXTINÇÃO DO PROCEDIMENTO JUDICIAL FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DE FACTO FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DE DIREITO

Keywords

AI generated
judicial order annulment lack of reasoning procedural extinction administrative law fundamental facts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
DL 20-A/90 de 1990/01/15 Art. 2
DL 20-A/90 de 1990/01/15 Art. 5 n.º 2
CPCI 63 Art. 1 parágrafo único
CPCI 63 Art. 115
CPC 67 Art. 158
CPC 67 Art. 666 n.º 3

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR PROC TRIBUT CONT - CONTRA-ORDENAÇÃO. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] DL 20-A/90 DE 1990/01/15 ART2 ART5 N2. CPCI63 ART1 PARÚNICO ART115. CPC67 ART158 ART666 N3. [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 95 [DATA DE ENTRADA] 11/27/1991 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00041621 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA219950222013802 [OBJECTO] SENT TT1INST. [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] FAZENDA PUBLICA [RECORRIDO 1] ESQUEMA-CENTRO DE ESTUDOS E EQUIPAMENTOS INDUSTRIAIS LDA [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/503C2F4AF3B8244F802568FC00391854?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Se do despacho que julgou extinto o procedimento judicial não se descortinam quais as razões de facto e de direito que presidiram a tal decisão, deve o mesmo ser anulado para nova prolação de decisão por parte do Tribunal "a quo" com a indispensável fundamentação.