Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0189/03 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses restriction on dental evidence as it violates the principle of freedom of proof.

Case Number 0189/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously dismissed the administrative act restricting the applicant's dental evidence. The Council of Ethics and Professional Dentistry approved a limitation on proving eighteen years of professional activity, leading to the applicant's exclusion from the accreditation list without assessing the specific evidence presented. The court ruled this restriction illegal because it violated the fundamental principle of freedom of proof, requiring a concrete evaluation of the applicant's submitted documents.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROCEDIMENTO ADMINISTRATIVO. LIBERDADE PROBATÓRIA. ODONTOLOGISTAS. RESTRIÇÃO DOS MEIOS DE PROVA

Keywords

AI generated
freedom of proof administrative evidence professional accreditation ethical council procedural illegality

Cited Legislation

AI generated
L. 4/99 de 1999/01/27, art. 2, n.º 2
L. 16/2002 de 2002/02/22
CPA91, art. 87, n.º 1, art. 3
Const., art. 266, n.º 2

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STAPLENO PROC248/03 DE 2004/11/09
AC STAPLENO PROC197/03 DE 2004/11/24
AC STAPLENO PROC225/03 DE 2004/11/24
AC STAPLENO PROC181/03 DE 2004/12/16
AC STAPLENO PROC175/03 DE 2005/01/25
AC STAPLENO PROC177/03 DE 2005/01/25
AC STAPLENO PROC202/03 DE 2005/01/25
AC STAPLENO PROC203/03 DE 2005/01/25
AC STAPLENO PROC208/03 DE 2005/01/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - ACTO. DIR ADM GER - POLÍCIA ADM.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] L 4/99 DE 1999/01/27 ART2 N2 ART3. L 16/2002 DE 2002/02/22. CPA91 ART87 N1 ART3. CONST ART266 N2.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STAPLENO PROC248/03 DE 2004/11/09.; AC STAPLENO PROC197/03 DE 2004/11/24.; AC STAPLENO PROC225/03 DE 2004/11/24.; AC STAPLENO PROC181/03 DE 2004/12/16.; AC STAPLENO PROC175/03 DE 2005/01/25.; AC STAPLENO PROC177/03 DE 2005/01/25.; AC STAPLENO PROC202/03 DE 2005/01/25.; AC STAPLENO PROC203/03 DE 2005/01/25.; AC STAPLENO PROC208/03 DE 2005/01/25.

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 01/22/2003

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00062218

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAP200506160189

[OBJECTO] AC STA.

[RECORRENTE] SEA DO MINSAUD

[RECORRIDO 1] A...

[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] FREITAS DO AMARAL CURSO DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO VOLII PAG42.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/162F993F94AECEC08025702F00321FD8?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

É ilegal, por ofensa do princípio da liberdade dos meios probatórios, a restrição dos meios tendentes a demonstrar a actividade profissional de odontologia durante 18 anos, restrição essa aprovada em acta pelo Conselho Ético e Profissional de Odontologia e determinante que o interessado fosse excluído da lista de acreditação sem que em concreto se apreciassem as provas por ele apresentadas.