Legislator Case Law & Legislation
006000 AI generated

Failure to appeal a tacit denial of appointment bars challenging subsequent exam results or prior ranking.

Case Number 006000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the applicant's challenge to his exam ranking and the appointment of a higher-ranked candidate. The applicant had previously requested a direct appointment without undergoing a competitive exam but failed to appeal the tacit denial of this request. Consequently, the court held that this procedural omission extinguished his right to contest the subsequent examination results or the final appointment order.

Legislator headnote

Official

NOMEAÇÃO INDEFERIMENTO TACITO FALTA DE INTERPOSIÇÃO DO RECURSO CONCURSO DE PROVIMENTO LISTA DE GRADUAÇÃO RECURSO CONTENCIOSO FUNDAMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
tacit denial of appointment failure to appeal extinction of right competitive exam ranking civil service law procedural waiver direct appointment request

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 34 of the Civil Service Law
Art. 53 of the Civil Service Law
Art. 489 of the Civil Service Law
Art. 15, No. 1 of Law 40768 of 1956
Art. 193 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 481, Para. 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Decree 38026 of 1950
Decree 42303 of 1959
Decree 41234 of 1957

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM GER - FUNÇÃO PUBL ESTATUTARIO. DIR ADM CONT.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] EFU56 ART34 ART53 ART489 PARUNICO. DL 40768 DE 1956/09/08. LOSTA56 ART15 N1. CPC67 ART193 ART481 PAR1. D 38026 DE 1950/11/02 NA REDACÇÃO DA PORT 16003 DE 1956/10/15 ART88. D 42303 DE 1959/06/04 ART1. D 41234 DE 1957/08/20.

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 1965

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00024638

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119620511006000

[Nº DO VOLUME] XXVIII

[OBJECTO] DESP MINULT.

[PAGINA] 25

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] DUARTE , BERNARDINO

[RECORRIDO 1] MINULT

[REFERENCIA PUBLICACAO 1] AD N11 ANOI PAG1364

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/13DF7B815C78CF2F802568FC0037C11D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O individuo que requereu a sua nomeação para determinado lugar por entender que devia ser ele o nomeado independentemente de concurso, não recorrendo do seu indeferimento tacito, cessou de ter o direito para, com esse fundamento, impugnar a classificação que nesse concurso obteve e a nomeação do candidato antes de si graduado.