Administrative disciplinary action dismissed due to prescription; suspension of prescription period not proven by the defendant.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the special administrative action filed against the Civil Service Tribunal for Administrative Discipline (CSTAF). The plaintiff alleged that the disciplinary proceedings were time-barred, while the defendant argued that the prescription period had been suspended pending the outcome of a prior investigation. The court ruled that the evidence failed to demonstrate a valid legal ground for suspending the prescription timeline, thereby confirming the action's expiration.
Legislator headnote
OfficialJUIZ PROCEDIMENTO DISCIPLINAR PRESCRIÇÃO SUSPENSÃO DA PRESCRIÇÃO FUNDAMENTAÇÃO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - FUNÇÃO PUBL / DISCIPLINAR
[AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR JUDIC - EST MAG
[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] EDF08 ART5 ART6 ART21 D EMJ85 ART131 CONST76 ART268 N3 DL 256-A/77 DE 1977/06/17 ART1 CPA91 ART124
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC310/08 DE 2008/12/04; AC STA PROC651/08 DE 2009/02/05
[DATA DE ENTRADA] 06/17/2011
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00067503
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1201203280622
[OBJECTO] DEL CSTAF DE 2011/05/11
[RECORRENTE] A......
[RECORRIDO 1] CSTAF
[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] MARCELLO CAETANO MANUAL DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO PAG477 ESTEVES DE OLIVEIRA DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO PAG470
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/12FA72BC3EECDBFE802579DF0052C6A5?OpenDocument