Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
032986 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects implied judgment opposition when one decision is explicit and the other implicit.

Case Number 032986
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the opposition to a judgment filed by Jorge Pereira against the Army Finance Department. The court held that a prerequisite for opposing a judgment under Article 24(b) of the Administrative Procedure Code is that the challenged decisions must both explicitly address the specific legal issue. Since the lower court's decision was only implicitly decided on the point in question, the opposition failed to meet the statutory requirements. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the condition for admissibility was not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

Official

OPOSIÇÃO DE JULGADOS JULGAMENTO IMPLÍCITO

Keywords

AI generated
implied judgment opposition of judgments administrative procedure code explicit ruling requirement supreme administrative court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 24(b) of the Administrative Procedure Code (ETAF)
Article 763(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC67)
Article 767(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC67)
Article 102 of the Law on Administrative Procedure (LPTA85)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STA PROC32498 DE 1994/06/28
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC32498 DE 1994/06/28.
AC STA PROC31646 DE 1994/09/29
AC STA PROC31646 DE 1994/09/29.
AC STA PROC32906 DE 1994/11/24
AC STA PROC32906 DE 1994/11/24.
AC STA PROC34918 DE 1995/02/21
AC STA PROC34918 DE 1995/02/21.
AC STJ DE 1991/03/15 IN BMJ N407 PAG413
AC STJ DE 1991/03/15 IN BMJ N407 PAG413.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - REC JURISDICIONAL.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] ETAF84 ART24 B. CPC67 ART763 N1 ART767 N1. LPTA85 ART102.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC32498 DE 1994/06/28. AC STA PROC31646 DE 1994/09/29. AC STA PROC32906 DE 1994/11/24. AC STA PROC34918 DE 1995/02/21. AC STJ DE 1991/03/15 IN BMJ N407 PAG413.

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 95

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 03/20/1995

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00043057

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAP19950627032986

[OBJECTO] AC 1 SECÇÃO DE 1994/12/15 - AC 1 SECÇÃO PROC33006.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] PEREIRA , JORGE

[RECORRIDO 1] GENERAL DIRECTOR DO DEPARTAMENTO DE FINANÇAS DO EXERCITO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/1141FC6DC3C76F7F802568FC00392C1F?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Um dos pressupostos do recurso para o Pleno da Secção do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo com fundamento em oposição de julgados - artigo 24, b) do ETAF - é as decisões perfilhadas serem expressas sobre a questão em causa, não podendo uma ser expressa e a outra implícita.