Legislator Case Law & Legislation
003791 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses appeal when the original administrative act is subsequently revoked, extinguishing the case's object.

Case Number 003791
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court refused to hear the appeal because the administrative act under review was later revoked, rendering the case devoid of any object. The appellant, a company representing flour millers, sought the revocation of a 1951 decision by the National Institute of Bread, but the court noted that the underlying act had already been nullified by a subsequent order. Consequently, the court applied Article 663 of the Civil Procedure Code to exempt the parties from court costs, as the procedural dispute no longer existed.

Legislator headnote

Official

REVOGAÇÃO DO ACTO RECORRIDO EXTINÇÃO DA INSTANCIA CUSTAS ISENÇÃO FALTA DE OBJECTO

Keywords

AI generated
extinction of object subsequent revocation administrative appeal court costs exemption lack of object

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC Art. 663

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - ACTO. [AREA TEMATICA 2] DIR PROC CIV. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPC39 ART663. [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 1955 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00027044 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119530501003791 [Nº DO VOLUME] XIX [OBJECTO] DESP SSE DO COMERCIO E INDUSTRIA DE 1951/06/15. [PAGINA] 29 [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] COMP DOS AMIDOS DO NORTE DE PORTUGAL SARL [RECORRIDO 1] SSE DO COMERCIO E INDUSTRIA - INST NAC DO PÃO - AMIDEX LDA [RECORRIDO 2] FED NAC DOS INDUSTRIAIS DE MOAGEM - COMP PORTUGUESA DE AMIDOS (COPAM) [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/0ADF5230DB8B72EC802568FC0037CE97?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Não se conhece do recurso quando posteriormente a sua interposição se deu satisfação a pretensão do recorrente.

E de aplicar, quanto a custas, a regra estabelecida na segunda parte do artigo 663 do Codigo de Processo Civil.