Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
002113 AI generated

Administrative appeal dismissed for failure to specify the violated law in conclusions under CPC Art. 690(3).

Case Number 002113
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Tribunal refused to hear the appeal because the appellant failed to identify the specific legal norm violated in their conclusions. The appellant argued for a review of substantive law violations, while the court emphasized the procedural requirement to pinpoint the exact article breached. Consequently, the court declined jurisdiction as the necessary specification was absent, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO PARA O TRIBUNAL PLENO ONUS DE ESPECIFICAR A LEI VIOLADA VIOLAÇÃO DE LEI

Keywords

AI generated
failure to specify law inadmissible appeal full tribunal jurisdiction substantive law violation procedural requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 690(3) of the Civil Procedure Code
Art. 26(b) of the Organic Law of the Supreme Administrative Tribunal

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STAP of 1965/07/14

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - REC JURISDICIONAL. [LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] LOSTA56 ART25 PAR1 N1 ART26 A - D B. CPC67 ART690 N3. RSTA57 ART42 ART103. [JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STAP DE 1965/07/14 IN AD N47. [1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 38 [ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 0 [APENDICE] DG [DATA DE ENTRADA] 11/30/1972 [DATA DO APENDICE] 11/06/1975 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00001333 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAP19740111002113 [OBJECTO] AC 1 SECÇÃO PROC8615. [PAGINA] 0 [PRIVACIDADE] 01 [RECORRENTE] SOLTROIA SARL E OUTRAS [RECORRIDO 1] COMIS ADMINISTRATIVA DA JUNTA AUTONOMA DO PORTO DE SETUBAL E OUTRAS [REFERENCIA PUBLICACAO 1] AD N151 ANOXIII PAG985 [REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] MARCELLO CAETANO MANUAL DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO 9ED VII PAG1359. [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/080419FE3C3BBCDE802568FC00380D27?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Nos termos do n. 3 do artigo 690 do Codigo de Processo Civil, aplicavel subsidiariamente no contencioso administrativo, não pode tomar-se conhecimento do recurso para o tribunal pleno fundado em violação de lei substantiva ou processual [cf. alinea b) do artigo

26 da Lei Organica do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo], se nas conclusões não se especificar a norma juridica violada.