Legislator Case Law & Legislation
02582/09.2BELSB AI generated

Supreme Court admits review of a dismissed execution case regarding attorney fees due to emerging legal uncertainty.

Case Number 02582/09.2BELSB
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court admitted the review of a final judgment that had dismissed an execution action for the purpose of issuing binding guidelines. The case involved a pension fund seeking attorney fees from an individual after the underlying lawsuit was extinguished due to the emergence of a new legal provision. The court ruled that despite the procedural dismissal, the emerging legal framework regarding the RCP and related norms necessitates the issuance of official orientations to clarify the matter.

Legislator headnote

Official

APRECIAÇÃO PRELIMINAR EXECUÇÃO HONORÁRIOS DE ADVOGADO

Keywords

AI generated
execution extinguished supervening uselessness attorney fees binding guidelines legal uncertainty RCP norms Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 223.º do Código de Processo Civil
Art. 224.º do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA000P24082

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA12019011102582/09

[RECORRENTE] CAIXA GERAL DE APOSENTAÇÕES

[RECORRIDO 1] A.........

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/07869BBC3C25BA478025838B003F447D?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

É de admitir a revista do acórdão que, numa execução extinta por «inutilidade superveniente da lide», condenou a executada a pagar ao exequente uma quantia a título de honorários de advogado, pois a emergência do RCP e das normas adjectivas conexas reclama que o Supremo emita orientações neste domínio – repetidamente tratado na jurisdição.