Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0427/06 AI generated

Supreme Administrative Court dismisses exceptional review appeal for lack of fundamental legal or social importance.

Case Number 0427/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court unanimously rejected the exceptional review appeal filed by the Madeira Region against a Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo decision. The appellant argued that the lower court's reasoning required fundamental reinterpretation of administrative law, but the court found the controversy lacked both intrinsic legal difficulty and broad social interest. Consequently, the appeal was inadmissible because a mere contested pronouncement in a prior judgment does not automatically justify an exceptional review.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO DE REVISTA EXCEPCIONAL. RECURSO JURISDICIONAL. NÃO ADMISSÃO DO RECURSO.

Keywords

AI generated
exceptional review appeal fundamental legal importance social interest scope administrative jurisdiction Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPTA, art. 150

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STA PROC1144/05 DE 2005/12/06
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC1144/05 DE 2005/12/06.; AC STA PROC1196/05 DE 2006/01/04.
AC STA PROC1196/05 DE 2006/01/04
[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC1144/05 DE 2005/12/06.; AC STA PROC1196/05 DE 2006/01/04.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - REC JURISDICIONAL - REC DE REVISTA EXCEPC.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CPTA02 ART150.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA PROC1144/05 DE 2005/12/06.; AC STA PROC1196/05 DE 2006/01/04.

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 04/28/2006

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00063121

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA1200605100427

[OBJECTO] AC TCA.

[RECORRENTE] REGIÃO AUTÓNOMA DA MADEIRA (RAM)

[RECORRIDO 1] FREGUESIA DE GAULA E OUTROS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/05084FF3DF198CF38025716F00361F71?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I – Não justifica a revista uma controvérsia que não apresenta importância fundamental, quer do ponto de vista jurídico (dificuldade intrínseca das operações de interpretação e aplicação do direito) quer do ponto de vista social (interesses comunitários de largo alcance).

II - O carácter meramente controvertido de uma pronúncia contida em Acórdão do TCA, não constitui, por si só, fundamento do recurso de revista.