Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
010090 AI generated

Administrative appeal dismissed because a prior act extinguished the case before the new procedural law took effect.

Case Number 010090
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against administrative decisions regarding dismissal and compulsory retirement. The appellant argued for the application of the new 1985 procedural law, but the court found that a prior act had already extinguished the legal object of the dispute. Consequently, the proceedings became impossible to continue under the new law, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

Official

MEDIDA DE SANEAMENTO DEMISSÃO APOSENTAÇÃO COMPULSIVA REVOGAÇÃO DO ACTO RECORRIDO IMPOSSIBILIDADE SUPERVENIENTE DA LIDE LEI DE PROCESSO NOS TRIBUNAIS ADMINISTRATIVOS LEI INOVADORA FALTA DE OBJECTO PROSSEGUIMENTO DO RECURSO

Keywords

AI generated
extinction of legal object impossibility of proceedings administrative procedure law civil procedure code superseding legislation administrative appeal extinguishing act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 310, n. 4 of the Constitution of 1976
Art. 663 of the Civil Procedure Code of 1967
Art. 48 of the Administrative Procedure Law of 1985

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Administrative Court decision of 1979/04/05
Supreme Administrative Court decision of 1979/06/07
Supreme Administrative Court Process 9894 of 1980/12/17

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR ADM CONT - ACTO.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CONST76 ART310 N4. CPC67 ART663. LPTA85 ART48.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA DE 1979/04/05 IN COL AC PAG155. AC STA DE 1979/06/07 IN COL AC PAG213. AC STAP PROC9894 DE 1980/12/17.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 20

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 86

[APENDICE] DR

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 05/10/1976

[DATA DO APENDICE] 11/16/1989

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00018632

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SA119860116010090

[OBJECTO] DESP MINJ DE 1974/09/19 / DE 1975/07/05 / DE 1975/08/22. DESP SE DA JUSTIÇA DE 1975/01/29.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] PINHO , DIONISIO

[RECORRIDO 1] MINJ - SE DA JUSTIÇA

[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] ARTUR MAURICIO E OUTROS CONTENCIOSO ADMINISTRATIVO PAG137.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jsta.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/0488FE9DF8DF8D1B802568FC00374291?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - E inovador o que se dispõe no artigo 48 da Lei de Processo - Decreto-Lei n. 267/85.

II - Assim, se, antes da entrada em vigor deste diploma, os actos recorridos deixavam de vigorar na ordem juridica por força de acto praticado na pendencia do recurso, este perdia o respectivo objecto, tornando-se impossivel a lide, por aplicação subsidiaria do artigo 663 do Codigo de Processo Civil.