Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
000131 AI generated

Customs court lacks jurisdiction over pre-1978 smuggling acts; case must go to appellate court.

Case Number 000131
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Administrative Court declared itself incompetent to hear a customs smuggling case involving facts predating the 1978 legislative change. The Public Prosecutor argued the case belonged to the Supreme Administrative Court, while the Second Section of the Supreme Administrative Court claimed jurisdiction. The court ruled that because the alleged offenses occurred before the new law, the case must be transferred to the appellate court of the relationship.

Legislator headnote

Official

CONFLITO DE JURISDIÇÃO DELITO ADUANEIRO COMPETENCIA DOS TRIBUNAIS JUDICIAIS

Keywords

AI generated
customs jurisdiction smuggling offenses legislative reform competence transfer appellate court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 of D.L. 173-A/78
Art. 35 of the Customs Code
Art. 37 of the Customs Code
Art. 55 of the Customs Code
Art. 56 of the Customs Code
Art. 116 of the Customs Code
Art. 173 of the Customs Code
Art. 1 of the Penal Code
Art. 279 of the Penal Code
Art. 280 of the Penal Code
Art. 32 of the Constitution
Art. 212 of the Constitution
Art. 213 of the Constitution
Art. 218 of the Constitution
Art. 219 of the Constitution

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STA 1978/01/12 IN BMJ N275 PAG73
AC CONFLITOS PROC93 DE 1980/02/14
AC CONFLITOS PROC93 DE 1980/02/14.
AC CONFLITOS PROC838 DE 1980/01/17
AC CONFLITOS PROC838 DE 1980/01/17.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[AREA TEMATICA 1] DIR PROC ADUAN CONT - PROC FISC.

[LEGISLACAO NACIONAL] CADU41 ART35 ART37 ART55 ART56 ART116 ART173. CP886 ART1 ART279 ART280. CONST76 ART32 ART212 ART213 N3 ART218 ART219. DL 173-A/78 DE 1978/07/08 ART2 ART3 ART13. LOTJ77 ART11 ART15. CPC67 ART71 A ART88. CCIV66 ART11. CADM40 ART613. DL 45224 DE 1963/09/04 ART1 ART2. D 16733 DE 1929/04/13 ART2 PAR1. D 16731 DE 1929/04/13 ART111. DL 25303 DE 1935/05/08 ART1.

[JURISPRUDENCIA NACIONAL] AC STA DE 1978/01/12 IN BMJ N275 PAG73. AC CONFLITOS PROC93 DE 1980/02/14. AC CONFLITOS PROC838 DE 1980/01/17.

[1ª PAG. DE PUBLICACAO DO ACORDAO] 17

[ANO DA PUBLICACAO] 81

[APENDICE] DR

[DATA DE ENTRADA] 11/07/1980

[DATA DO APENDICE] 06/17/1985

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JSTA00029630

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] SAC19810226000131

[OBJECTO] NEGATIVO JURISDIÇÃO STA - RL.

[PRIVACIDADE] 01

[RECORRENTE] MINISTERIO PUBLICO

[RECORRIDO 1] 2 SECÇÃO DO STA - RL

[REFERENCIA A DOUTRINA] FIGUEIREDO DIAS IN RLJ ANO111 PAG83.

[REFERENCIA A PARECERES] P CC 27/77 DE 1977/10/27.

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jcon.nsf/35fbbbf22e1bb1e680256f8e003ea931/C259196B73EC78B68025713B003B59A2?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Do despacho de indiciação, em processo fiscal aduaneiro, por autoria do delito de contrabando, relativamente a factos ocorridos em data anterior a data indicada no artigo 13 do Decreto-Lei n. 173-A/78, cabe recurso para os tribunais da Relação, sendo incompetente, para esse efeito, a 2 Secção do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.