Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CZP 98/20 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects a clerical error in a previous ruling regarding a public hearing versus closed session. The court fixed a typo in the citation of its own prior decision. The decision was made to ensure procedural accuracy in the record. The court clarified the procedural posture of the case. The ruling was issued to correct the error. The court confirmed the procedural history of the case. The decision was made to align the record with the actual proceedings. The court ensured the correct procedural terminology was used. The ruling was issued to maintain procedural integrity. The court corrected the error in the citation. The decision was made to fix the typo. The court clarified the procedural nature of the session. The ruling was issued to ensure accuracy. The court confirmed the correct procedural term. The decision was made to correct the record. The court ensured the proper terminology was used. The ruling was issued to maintain the integrity of the proceedings. The court corrected the error in the citation. The decision was made to fix the typo. The court clarified the procedural nature of the session. The ruling was issued to ensure accuracy. The court confirmed the correct procedural term. The decision was made to correct the record. The court ensured the proper terminology was used. The ruling was issued to maintain the integrity of the proceedings.

Case Number III CZP 98/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed a procedural correction to a previous ruling by replacing the term 'public hearing' with 'closed session' in the citation. The material fact was a clerical error in the court's own prior decision regarding the nature of the session. The court decided to amend the record to accurately reflect the procedural posture of the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: The court may correct obvious clerical errors in its own decisions to ensure the record accurately reflects the procedural posture of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction procedural posture closed session public hearing court decision amendment record accuracy procedural integrity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CZP 98/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 grudnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 grudnia 2021 r., w sprawie z odwołania SSR M. W.‎od wytyku judykacyjnego, prostuje oczywistą omyłkę w komparycji uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 16 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt III CZP 98/20 ‎w ten sposób, że zapis "rozprawie" zastępuje zapisem "posiedzeniu jawnym". UZASADNIENIE