Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CZP 103/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to exclude judge from ruling on legal issue exclusion motion.

Case Number III CZP 103/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the University's request to exclude Judge X.Y. from deciding on the motion to exclude a legal issue. The University argued that the judge should recuse themselves from ruling on the exclusion motion itself, while the opposing parties contended the judge could properly adjudicate the procedural request. The court determined that the judge was not biased and could impartially decide on the procedural motion without violating the principle of impartiality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 237 § 2 k.p.c.: A judge may rule on a motion to exclude a legal issue without recusal if no bias or conflict of interest is established.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal legal issue exclusion procedural motion impartiality principle Supreme Court procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 237 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CZP 103/22 POSTANOWIENIE 15 września 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk na posiedzeniu niejawnym 15 września 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa Uniwersytetu […]‎przeciwko J. L., P. L., M. S., W. P., H. P. i M. W.‎o zapłatę‎na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y. wyłączenia od rozpoznania zagadnienia prawnego przedstawionego postanowieniem Sądu Najwyższego z 3 lutego 2022 r., II CSKP 371/22, wyłącza sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y. od orzekania w sprawie o sygn. akt III CZP 103/22. UZASADNIENIE[PG][ms]