Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CZ 42/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to supplement ruling on declaration of will due to lack of new facts.

Case Number III CZ 42/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to supplement its own ruling of February 2, 2022, regarding a declaration of will. The plaintiff argued that new circumstances necessitated an amendment to the original decision. The court rejected this, holding that a ruling cannot be supplemented based on facts or arguments not previously considered in the original proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 200 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 200 § 2 k.p.c.: A court ruling cannot be supplemented with new facts or arguments that were not part of the original proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementing ruling declaration of will new facts civil procedure Supreme Court procedural order lack of grounds

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 200 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 200 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CZ 42/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 31 maja 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: Pierwszy Prezes SN Małgorzata Manowska‎ (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Marcin Łochowski‎SSN Tomasz Szanciło w sprawie z powództwa A. J.‎przeciwko miastu W.‎o zobowiązanie do złożenia oświadczenia woli,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 31 maja 2022 r.,‎wniosku powoda o uzupełnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 3 lutego 2022 r. sygn. akt III CZ 42/22, oddala wniosek.