Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CZ 269/23 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects a clerical error in a prior decision regarding the participation of the prosecutor in the proceedings.

Case Number III CZ 269/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the appeal to correct a clerical inaccuracy in a previous ruling concerning the parties involved. The plaintiffs sought to have the prior decision amended to explicitly include the District Prosecutor of S. as a participant in the proceedings. The court ruled that the omission was a material error requiring correction to ensure the legal record accurately reflects the procedural history.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 ust. 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may correct clerical errors in its own decisions if such errors affect the substance of the ruling or the identity of the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction procedural history amendment parties participation Supreme Court ruling prosecutor involvement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 943/21
Appeal dismissed; claim for additional works rejected due to lack of written contract, replaced by unjust enrichment claim.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CZ 269/23 POSTANOWIENIE 10 stycznia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela na posiedzeniu niejawnym 10 stycznia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek zażalenia A. K. i K. K.‎na wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z 30 marca 2023 r., I ACa 943/21,‎w sprawie z powództwa K. K.1‎przeciwko A. K. i K. K. z udziałem Prokuratora Okręgowego w S.‎o uznanie czynności prawnej za bezskuteczną, prostuje niedokładność w komparycji postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 16 listopada 2023 r., III CZ 269/23, przez dopisanie: "z udziałem Prokuratora Okręgowego w S.". [S.J.] [ał] UZASADNIENIE