Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CZ 182/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses judge's participation due to conflict of interest involving the plaintiff's fund manager.

Case Number III CZ 182/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the judge's participation in the case due to a conflict of interest. The plaintiff is a non-standardized closed investment fund, and the judge was excluded because he had previously served as a manager for the fund's assets. The court ruled that the judge's prior role created an objective inability to remain impartial, necessitating his removal from the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 240 k.p.c.: A judge must be excluded from a case if they have previously acted as a manager of the plaintiff's investment fund, as this creates an objective conflict of interest preventing impartial adjudication.

Keywords

AI generated
conflict of interest investment fund manager judicial impartiality exclusion of judge closed investment fund objective inability Sąd Najwyższy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 240 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt III CZ 182/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 września 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa H. Niestandaryzowanego Sekurytyzacyjnego Funduszu Inwestycyjnego Zamkniętego w W.‎przeciwko M. K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 5 września 2022 r., na skutek wniosku Sędziego Sądu Najwyższego Jacka Widło z 10 sierpnia 2022 r. o wyłączenie od orzekania w sprawie o sygn. akt III CZ 182/22 stwierdzam istnienie przesłanek wyłączenia Sędziego SN Jacka Widły od rozpoznania sprawy.