Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III CZ 164/23 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects its own ruling by adding clarification to the disputed section of the judgment.

Case Number III CZ 164/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court issued a supplementary ruling to clarify a specific section of its previous decision regarding the disputed judgment. The appellant and respondent argued over the precise scope of the correction needed in the second point of the contested verdict. The court decided to amend its own text by explicitly stating that the correction applies only to the second point, thereby limiting the scope of the amendment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may correct its own rulings to clarify the scope of the decision, but such corrections must be strictly limited to the specific points identified by the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
supreme court correction clarification of judgment scope of amendment procedural remedy civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CZ 164/23 POSTANOWIENIE 6 grudnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek na posiedzeniu niejawnym 6 grudnia 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa B. P. i M. F.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w G.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek wniosku pozwanego o uzupełnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 19 października 2023 r., III CZ 164/23, uzupełnia sentencję postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 19 października 2023 r., III CZ 164/23, w ten sposób, że po słowach "zaskarżony wyrok" dopisuje "w części tj. w zakresie pkt 2". (M.K.)

UZASADNIENIE

[ms]