Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III CO 1254/24 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects clerical error in judgment regarding case number I ACo 10/23. The court fixed a typo changing V ACo to I ACo in the sentence. This procedural correction ensures accurate case identification without altering substantive rights. The decision reaffirms the importance of textual precision in legal documents. No new legal issues were raised by this specific ruling. The outcome is purely administrative and procedural in nature.

Case Number III CO 1254/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court issued a ruling to correct a clerical error in its own previous judgment regarding case I ACo 10/23. The original text mistakenly cited 'V ACo' instead of 'I ACo', which the court identified as an obvious mistake. By amending the sentence, the court ensured the correct case number was referenced, maintaining the integrity of the legal record without affecting the underlying merits of the dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 365 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 365 ust. 2 k.p.c.: The court may correct obvious clerical errors in its own judgments to ensure accurate case identification and textual precision.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction judgment amendment case number typo procedural rectification Supreme Court ruling textual accuracy administrative correction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 365 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 365 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

III CO 1254/24 POSTANOWIENIE 20 grudnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk na posiedzeniu niejawnym 20 grudnia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa C.B.‎przeciwko Skarbowi Państwa-Sądowi Okręgowemu w Słupsku i Skarbowi Państwa-Sądowi Okręgowemu w Bydgoszczy‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek wystąpienia przez Sąd Apelacyjny w Gdańsku‎zarządzeniem z 8 października 2024 r., o rozpoznanie żądań wyłączenia sędziów w sprawie I ACo 10/23, prostuje oczywistą omyłkę w sentencji postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 29 listopada 2024 r., sygn. akt III CO 1254/24 w ten sposób, że zwrot: "V ACo" zastępuje zwrotem: "I ACo". (A.G.)r.g.