Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II USK 70/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's appeal as inadmissible due to lack of legal interest in the case.

Case Number II USK 70/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the prosecutor's appeal inadmissible and ordered the return of the document to the file. The prosecutor sought to intervene in a dispute between a claimant and the Social Insurance Office regarding a bridge pension. The court ruled that the prosecutor lacked a legal interest to intervene in this specific administrative matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 109 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 129 ust. 1 k.p.c.: The prosecutor's intervention is inadmissible when the public interest does not justify the intervention or when the prosecutor lacks a legal interest in the outcome of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor intervention legal interest public interest social insurance dispute bridge pension inadmissible appeal procedural standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 109 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 129 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II USK 70/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 października 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Renata Żywicka na posiedzeniu niejawnym 28 października 2025 r. w Warszawie w sprawie z odwołania J.K.‎przeciwko Zakładowi Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddziałowi w Gdańsku‎o prawo do emerytury pomostowej, I. uznaje za niedopuszczalne wstąpienie do niniejszej sprawy Prokuratora Mariusza Kowala; II. zarządza zwrot pisma złożonego przez wyżej wymienionego Prokuratora do akt 24 października 2025 r. [I.T.][SOP]