Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II USK 69/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's entry into civil case regarding agricultural pension and occupational disease.

Case Number II USK 69/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the prosecutor's intervention in the civil proceedings inadmissible and ordered the return of the prosecutor's letter to the file. The case concerns J.G.'s claim for an agricultural pension linked to an occupational disease against the Agricultural Social Insurance Fund. The court ruled that the prosecutor lacked standing to intervene in this specific civil dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 12 ust. 1 KPA; Art. 12 ust. 2 KPA: The prosecutor may not intervene in civil proceedings unless the public interest is directly affected by the outcome of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor intervention civil proceedings public interest agricultural pension occupational disease standing to intervene KPA provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 12 ust. 1 KPA
Art. 12 ust. 2 KPA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II USK 69/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 listopada 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Żywicka na posiedzeniu niejawnym 5 listopada 2025 r. w Warszawie w sprawie z odwołania J.G.‎przeciwko Prezesowi Kasy Rolniczego Ubezpieczenia Społecznego‎o prawo do renty rolniczej w związku z chorobą zawodową, I. uznaje za niedopuszczalne wstąpienie do niniejszej sprawy Prokuratora Andrzeja Piasecznego; II. zarządza zwrot pisma złożonego przez wyżej wymienionego Prokuratora do akt 27 października 2025 r. [a.ł]