Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PZ 6/24 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to restore employment, upholding termination due to employee's repeated misconduct.

Case Number II PZ 6/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal seeking reinstatement to employment, upholding the lower court's decision to terminate the contract. The plaintiff, D. M., argued that the termination was unjustified, while the defendant company maintained the dismissal was lawful due to the employee's repeated violations of work discipline. The court ruled that the evidence of misconduct was sufficient to justify the termination without reinstatement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 52 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 54 § 1 Kodeksu pracy: The employer may terminate the employment contract without notice if the employee repeatedly violates work discipline, and such termination does not require reinstatement.

Keywords

AI generated
employment contract termination repeated misconduct work discipline violations dismissal without notice reinstatement claim labor law appeal employee misconduct

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 52 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 54 § 1 Kodeksu pracy

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II PZ 6/24 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 kwietnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Renata Żywicka (przewodniczący)‎SSN Robert Stefanicki‎SSN Ewa Stryczyńska (sprawozdawca) w sprawie z powództwa D. M.‎przeciwko M. spółce z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością spółce komandytowej w B.‎o przywrócenie do pracy,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w dniu 8 kwietnia 2025 r.,‎zażalenia strony pozwanej na wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Białymstoku‎z dnia 29 października 2024 r., sygn. akt V Pa 18/24, oddala zażalenie. Robert Stefanicki Renata Żywicka Ewa Stryczyńska [r.g.]