Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PSKP 24/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's entry due to lack of standing in labor dispute between employee and company.

Case Number II PSKP 24/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the prosecutor's request to join the labor dispute inadmissible and ordered the return of the document. The plaintiff, T.W., sued M. Sp. z o.o. regarding damages and employment contract terms, while the prosecutor sought to intervene. The court ruled that the prosecutor lacks standing to participate in this specific civil labor matter.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 101 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 102 ust. 1 k.p.c.: The public prosecutor may not intervene in civil proceedings unless the law explicitly grants them standing, which does not apply to standard labor disputes between private parties.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor standing labor dispute civil procedure intervention inadmissible private parties

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 101 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 102 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II PSKP 24/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 4 listopada 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Żywicka (przewodniczący)‎SSN Jarosław Sobutka (sprawozdawca)‎SSN Robert Stefanicki na posiedzeniu niejawnym 4 listopada 2025 r. w Warszawie w sprawie z powództwa T.W.‎przeciwko M. Sp. z o.o. w W.‎o odszkodowanie, ustalenie treści stosunku pracy, I. uznaje za niedopuszczalne wstąpienie do niniejszej sprawy Prokuratora Mariusza Kowala; II. zarządza zwrot pisma złożonego przez wyżej wymienionego Prokuratora do akt 29 października 2025 r. DS.[SOP]