Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PSK 11/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses prosecutor's intervention in civil damages suit as inadmissible procedural step.

Case Number II PSK 11/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the prosecutor's intervention in the civil damages case between A.K. and V. Sp. z o.o. inadmissible and ordered the return of the submitted document. The plaintiff sought compensation while the prosecutor attempted to join the proceedings, arguing a public interest in the matter. The court ruled that the prosecutor lacks standing to intervene in this specific civil dispute, thereby preserving the parties' autonomy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 104 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 104 § 2 k.p.c.: The prosecutor may not intervene in civil proceedings unless the law expressly provides for such possibility.

Keywords

AI generated
prosecutor intervention civil proceedings procedural inadmissibility standing to intervene civil damages claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 104 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 104 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II PSK 11/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 października 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Żywicka na posiedzeniu niejawnym 28 października 2025 r. w Warszawie w sprawie z powództwa A.K.‎przeciwko V. Sp. z o.o. z siedzibą w W.‎o odszkodowanie, I. uznaje za niedopuszczalne wstąpienie do niniejszej sprawy prokuratora Mariusza Kowala; II. zarządza zwrot pisma złożonego przez wyżej wymienionego Prokuratora do akt 24 października 2025 r.[SOP]