Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II PK 172/19 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request to correct judgment regarding special award for labor dispute case.

Case Number II PK 172/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to correct or supplement its previous judgment dated December 3, 2020. The plaintiff, H. Z., sought a special award against the County Office in T. based on arguments regarding labor dispute specifics. The court rejected the correction request as the original decision was legally sound and no grounds for amendment existed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: A judgment may be corrected only if the court discovers an error in the text that does not affect the decision; otherwise, a new ruling is required.

Keywords

AI generated
correction of judgment special award labor dispute Supreme Court procedural error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt II PK 172/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jolanta Frańczak w sprawie z powództwa H. Z.‎przeciwko Starostwu Powiatowemu w T.‎o nagrodę specjalną,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w dniu 22 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎wniosku pełnomocnika z urzędu powoda o sprostowanie albo uzupełnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 3 grudnia 2020 r, II PK 172/19, oddala wniosek. UZASADNIENIE