Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II CSKP 990/23 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects appellate case number from I ACa to V ACa due to clerical error in docket notation.

Case Number II CSKP 990/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the cassation appeal to correct a clerical error in the designation of the appealed judgment. The lower court had incorrectly labeled the case as 'I ACa 309/21' instead of 'V ACa 309/21' in its procedural documents. The court ruled that this discrepancy was a mere notational mistake requiring correction rather than a substantive legal error.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 ust. 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 ust. 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may correct clerical errors in the designation of judgments if the error does not affect the substance of the decision.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error case designation cassation appeal procedural correction docket notation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 ust. 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 ust. 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 990/23 POSTANOWIENIE 30 września 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Pawłyszcze na posiedzeniu niejawnym 30 września 2024 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Bank S.A. w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Gdańsku z 14 kwietnia 2022 r., V ACa 309/21,‎wydanego w sprawie z powództwa A. K. i W. K.‎przeciwko Bank S.A. w W. ‎o zapłatę, prostuje w postanowieniu z 23 sierpnia 2024 r., ‎II CSKP 990/23, oznaczenie zaskarżonego wyroku ‎z "I ACa 309/21" na "V ACa 309/21". [SOP] [ms]